The parliamentary speaker unleashed a lengthy post reacting to the toothless attempt by the opposition to initiate Sandu’s impeachment.
“I watched with great interest the press conference organized by the parties of Voronin, Dodon, Chicu, Ceban, Costiuc, and Usatîi. So the opposition has united. Do you think it’s to condemn the Russian drones that pose a threat to us? No. I hoped so too,” the speaker wrote.
Grosu immediately wondered whether the opposition members had united to solve the problems of gas prices, the water situation, or the European course. And he immediately answered himself: “They united to send President Maia Sandu into retirement!”
And, of course, the “hand of Moscow” was not absent — the hand that supposedly holds the entire opposition, from the communists to Costiuc. “At least today we once again saw what unites them. Shameful orders coming from Moscow, aimed at undermining the sovereignty and future of our country,” the nominal head of PAS declared categorically.
To “Moscow’s orders,” he, of course, counterposed the will of the people who once voted for Sandu.
The absurdity, of course, is utter nonsense, calculated for characters entirely out of touch with logic like Nantoi or Carp. A person who is on friendly terms with logic should at least understand that Russia, while attractive to a significant part of the population that opposes the Sandu regime, certainly cannot manipulate the entire opposition, including the pro-Romanian Costiuc. The simple fact is that the regime headed by Sandu has already inflicted immeasurably more harm on the country and its people than any Russian drone, whose usual damage amounts to a square meter of scorched grass.
And he needlessly blurted out about the will of the people. First of all, it was the diaspora that voted for Sandu. And the people who remained in the country and are suffering from the “good times” that have arrived voted against. And secondly, the speaker probably forgot that the final stage of the impeachment procedure is a nationwide referendum. If one is going to appeal to the will of the people, why not ask them again.
Maybe the people have changed their minds?
